Federal Covered Securities
Federal Covered Securities
Securities exempt from state registration requirements under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act (NSMIA) of 1996, including securities listed on national exchanges (NYSE, NASDAQ, etc.), investment company securities (mutual funds, ETFs), and securities sold under Regulation D Rule 506 offerings. States retain authority to require notice filing and filing fees but cannot impose merit review or substantive registration requirements. States maintain full anti-fraud enforcement authority over federal covered securities.
Apple Inc. stock, listed on NASDAQ, is a federal covered security. If an issuer wants to offer Apple shares in California, they do not need to register with California securities regulators or undergo state merit review. California can only require notice filing and collect fees, but cannot deny the registration based on merit. However, if fraud is involved in selling Apple stock in California, state regulators retain full authority to investigate and prosecute.
Students often confuse which Regulation D rules create federal covered securities: Rule 506(b) and 506(c) offerings ARE federal covered securities (exempt from state registration), but Rule 504 offerings are NOT federal covered securities and may require state registration. Also commonly confused: federal covered securities status exempts from state registration requirements but does NOT exempt from state anti-fraud laws or notice filing requirements.
How This Is Tested
- Identifying which securities qualify as federal covered securities (exchange-listed, investment companies, Rule 506 offerings)
- Distinguishing between state registration requirements for federal covered securities versus non-covered securities
- Understanding state authority limits over federal covered securities (notice filing and anti-fraud enforcement only)
- Recognizing that Rule 506 offerings are federal covered but Rule 504 offerings are not
- Determining when notice filing is required for federal covered securities versus when full state registration applies
Regulatory Limits
| Description | Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified exchanges (federal covered) | NYSE, NASDAQ, or equivalent national exchanges | Securities listed on these exchanges automatically qualify as federal covered |
| Investment company securities | All registered investment company securities (1940 Act) | Includes mutual funds, ETFs, closed-end funds, UITs |
| Regulation D federal covered securities | Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) only | Rule 504 offerings are NOT federal covered securities |
| State authority over federal covered securities | Notice filing, fees, and anti-fraud enforcement only | States cannot impose merit review or substantive registration requirements |
Example Exam Questions
Test your understanding with these practice questions. Select an answer to see the explanation.
Meridian Investment Advisers is recommending a private placement to several clients. The offering is being conducted under Regulation D Rule 506(b), raising $25 million from accredited investors in multiple states including Texas, Florida, and New York. The adviser wants to know what registration requirements apply in each state. Which of the following statements is accurate?
B is correct. Securities offered under Regulation D Rule 506(b) are federal covered securities under NSMIA, which means they are exempt from state registration requirements. However, states retain authority to require notice filing (Form D) and collect filing fees. The issuer must comply with these notice filing requirements in each state where securities are offered or sold, but states cannot impose full registration or merit review.
A is incorrect because Rule 506(b) offerings ARE federal covered securities exempt from state registration under NSMIA. C is incorrect because while Rule 506(b) offerings are exempt from state registration, states can still require notice filing and fees. NSMIA did not eliminate all state authority, only registration and merit review authority. D is incorrect because states are explicitly prohibited from conducting merit review of federal covered securities. Merit review authority was preempted by NSMIA for federal covered securities.
The Series 65 exam tests your understanding of the balance between federal and state authority under NSMIA. Knowing that Rule 506 offerings are federal covered securities (exempt from state registration but subject to notice filing) is critical for advising clients on private placement compliance and understanding multi-state offering requirements.
Which federal law created the federal covered securities designation and preempted state registration authority over certain securities?
D is correct. The National Securities Markets Improvement Act (NSMIA) of 1996 created the federal covered securities designation and preempted state authority to require registration of these securities. NSMIA established that securities listed on national exchanges, investment company securities, and Rule 506 offerings would be regulated at the federal level, with states limited to notice filing, fee collection, and anti-fraud enforcement.
A is incorrect because the Securities Act of 1933 established federal securities registration requirements but did not preempt state authority. Prior to NSMIA, issuers faced dual federal-state registration (blue sky laws). B is incorrect because the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 primarily regulates secondary market trading, broker-dealers, and exchanges, not the federal-state division of registration authority. C is incorrect because the Investment Company Act of 1940 regulates mutual funds and other investment companies but did not create the federal covered securities concept.
The Series 65 exam regularly tests knowledge of major securities legislation and their purposes. Understanding that NSMIA created the federal covered securities system is essential for questions about regulatory jurisdiction and the division between federal and state authority over securities registration.
Master Laws & Regulations Concepts
CertFuel's spaced repetition system helps you retain key terms like Federal Covered Securities and 500+ other exam concepts. Start practicing for free.
Access Free BetaAn investment adviser is evaluating four different securities for client portfolios. Which of the following would qualify as federal covered securities exempt from state registration requirements?
B is correct. Securities listed on national exchanges such as NASDAQ (along with NYSE and other equivalent exchanges) automatically qualify as federal covered securities under NSMIA. Microsoft stock listed on NASDAQ is exempt from state registration requirements, though states can require notice filing and collect fees.
A is incorrect because Rule 504 offerings are NOT federal covered securities. Only Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) offerings under Regulation D qualify as federal covered securities. Rule 504 offerings may still require state registration or a state exemption. C is incorrect because Rule 701 (employee compensation plans) provides a different exemption but does not create federal covered security status under NSMIA. D is incorrect because municipal securities have their own exemption from registration (both federal and state) under the Securities Act of 1933, but they are not classified as "federal covered securities" under NSMIA. This is a technical distinction the exam may test.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to identify which securities qualify as federal covered securities. Understanding that exchange-listed securities and Rule 506 (but not Rule 504) offerings are federal covered is essential for determining registration requirements and advising clients on compliance obligations across multiple states.
All of the following are categories of federal covered securities under NSMIA EXCEPT
C is correct (the EXCEPT answer). Securities offered under Regulation D Rule 504 are NOT federal covered securities. Rule 504 offerings (limited to $10 million in 12 months) do not receive federal covered security status and may require state registration or reliance on state exemptions. This is a key distinction from Rule 506 offerings.
A is a category of federal covered securities: Securities listed on national exchanges such as NYSE, NASDAQ, and equivalent exchanges automatically qualify as federal covered securities under NSMIA Section 18(b)(1). B is a category of federal covered securities: All securities issued by investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (mutual funds, ETFs, closed-end funds, UITs) are federal covered securities under NSMIA. D is a category of federal covered securities: Securities offered under Regulation D Rule 506(c) (along with Rule 506(b)) are federal covered securities, exempt from state registration requirements though subject to state notice filing.
The Series 65 exam tests your detailed knowledge of which Regulation D rules create federal covered securities. Many candidates incorrectly assume all Regulation D offerings are federal covered, but only Rule 506(b) and 506(c) qualify. Rule 504 offerings remain subject to state registration requirements, making this a frequently tested distinction.
Velocity Mutual Fund, a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is being offered to investors in California by a broker-dealer. Which of the following statements about this offering are accurate?
1. The fund shares are federal covered securities under NSMIA
2. California can require the broker-dealer to register with the state
3. California can require merit review of the fund before it can be sold
4. California retains anti-fraud enforcement authority over the sale of the fund shares
B is correct. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate.
Statement 1 is TRUE: Securities issued by registered investment companies (mutual funds, ETFs, etc. registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940) are automatically federal covered securities under NSMIA. Velocity Mutual Fund shares qualify as federal covered securities.
Statement 2 is TRUE: While the fund shares themselves are federal covered securities exempt from state registration, the broker-dealer selling the shares is NOT exempt from state registration. California can require the broker-dealer to register as a broker-dealer in the state. Federal covered security status applies to the security, not the seller.
Statement 3 is FALSE: States are explicitly prohibited from imposing merit review requirements on federal covered securities. California cannot review the fund's investment strategy, fee structure, or other substantive elements to determine if it "merits" being sold in the state. NSMIA preempted state merit review authority for federal covered securities.
Statement 4 is TRUE: NSMIA did not eliminate state anti-fraud authority. California retains full authority to investigate and prosecute fraud in the offer or sale of federal covered securities. States can enforce their anti-fraud provisions and pursue fraudulent activities even though they cannot require registration or merit review.
The Series 65 exam tests your understanding of the scope and limits of NSMIA preemption. Knowing that federal covered security status exempts the security from state registration and merit review, but does NOT exempt sellers from state registration requirements or eliminate state anti-fraud authority, is critical for multi-faceted compliance questions.
💡 Memory Aid
Think "Federal Covered = Federal Floor, No State Door": These securities have met federal standards (the floor) so states cannot block them at the door (no merit review or registration). But states can still check your ID (notice filing/fees) and arrest you for lying (anti-fraud). Big 3 categories: Exchange-listed stocks, Mutual funds/ETFs, Rule 506 offerings.
Related Concepts
This term is part of this cluster:
More in Regulatory Bodies
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The primary federal regulator of securities markets, investment advisers, and se...
North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA)
The association of state securities regulators that develops model rules like th...
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
A self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates broker-dealers and their reg...