Reserve Requirements
Reserve Requirements
The percentage of customer deposits that commercial banks must hold in reserve (as vault cash or deposits at Federal Reserve Banks), rather than lending out. Set by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, reserve requirements were historically used to control money supply and ensure banking system stability. Since March 26, 2020, the Fed has set reserve requirements to 0%, effectively eliminating this as an active monetary policy tool. The Fed now relies primarily on open market operations, the discount rate, and interest on reserve balances (IORB) to implement monetary policy.
Historically, if a bank had $100 million in deposits and the reserve requirement was 10%, it had to hold $10 million in reserve and could lend out only $90 million. When the Fed raised reserve requirements, banks had less money to lend, tightening credit. Since March 2020, the 0% reserve requirement means banks theoretically can lend all deposits, though they voluntarily hold reserves to manage liquidity and earn interest on reserve balances from the Fed.
Students often confuse reserve requirements with the federal funds rate. Reserve requirements are the percentage of deposits banks must hold in reserve (currently 0%), while the federal funds rate is the interest rate for overnight lending between banks. Additionally, even though reserve requirements are now 0%, banks still hold substantial reserves voluntarily to manage liquidity and earn IORB from the Fed.
How This Is Tested
- Understanding that reserve requirements determine what percentage of deposits banks must hold vs. can lend out
- Recognizing that lowering reserve requirements is expansionary (increases money supply) while raising them is contractionary (decreases money supply)
- Identifying that reserve requirements are set by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, not Congress or the FOMC
- Calculating the money multiplier effect when reserve requirements change (though less relevant since 2020)
- Understanding that since 2020, reserve requirements are 0% and no longer an active policy tool, replaced by IORB
Regulatory Limits
| Description | Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Current reserve requirement (all deposit types) | 0% (since March 26, 2020) | Applies to all depository institutions |
| Historical reserve requirement (transaction accounts over $127.5M) | 10% (pre-March 2020) | No longer in effect but may appear in exam questions |
| Historical reserve requirement (transaction accounts $16.9M-$127.5M) | 3% (pre-March 2020) | Tiered structure eliminated in 2020 |
| Historical reserve requirement (transaction accounts under $16.9M) | 0% (pre-March 2020) | Small institutions exemption |
Example Exam Questions
Test your understanding with these practice questions. Select an answer to see the explanation.
Jennifer, a financial advisor, is reviewing economic policy with a client who remembers the Fed using reserve requirements as a policy tool in the past. The client asks why the Fed reduced reserve requirements to 0% in March 2020 and whether this will cause runaway inflation by allowing banks to lend unlimited amounts. Which statement best explains the situation?
B is correct. While the 0% reserve requirement technically removes the regulatory floor, banks still voluntarily hold significant reserves for several reasons: managing daily liquidity needs, meeting customer withdrawal demands, and earning interest on reserve balances (IORB) paid by the Fed. The Fed shifted to other monetary policy tools (open market operations, discount rate, and IORB) to control money supply, making reserve requirements obsolete as an active policy lever.
A is incorrect because the Fed did not raise rates when reserve requirements went to 0% in March 2020. In fact, the Fed lowered rates to near-zero during the pandemic response. Additionally, banks face many other lending constraints beyond reserve requirements (capital requirements, credit risk assessment, loan demand, etc.). C is factually wrong: the 0% requirement applies to all depository institutions of all sizes, not just small banks. D confuses monetary policy tools with prudential regulation. Capital requirements (like Basel III standards) serve a safety and soundness purpose (ensuring banks can absorb losses), not the same monetary policy function as reserve requirements (controlling money supply).
The Series 65 exam tests your understanding of how Fed policy tools have evolved and why certain historical tools (like reserve requirements) are no longer actively used. Advisors must explain to clients that the Fed has multiple policy levers and that eliminating reserve requirements does not mean abandoning monetary policy control. Understanding this helps you discuss Fed policy changes without creating unnecessary client anxiety.
What is the current reserve requirement set by the Federal Reserve for commercial banks on all types of deposits?
D is correct. Since March 26, 2020, the Federal Reserve has set reserve requirements to 0% for all deposit types at all depository institutions. This action was taken during the COVID-19 pandemic and has remained in effect, effectively eliminating reserve requirements as an active monetary policy tool.
A (3%) was historically the reserve requirement for transaction accounts in the middle tier ($16.9M-$127.5M) before March 2020, but is no longer applicable. B (5%) was never a standard reserve requirement percentage in the modern era. C (10%) was the historical requirement for transaction accounts over $127.5 million before March 2020, but this tiered structure was eliminated when requirements went to 0%.
The Series 65 exam tests knowledge of current monetary policy tools and regulatory structures. While reserve requirements were historically important, understanding they are currently 0% is essential for correctly answering questions about how the Fed implements monetary policy today. Exam questions may reference historical reserve requirements to test whether you understand current vs. past policy frameworks.
Master Economic Factors Concepts
CertFuel's spaced repetition system helps you retain key terms like Reserve Requirements and 500+ other exam concepts. Start practicing for free.
Access Free BetaHistorically, when the Federal Reserve lowered reserve requirements from 10% to 8%, what was the likely intended effect on the economy?
B is correct. Lowering reserve requirements is an expansionary monetary policy action. When the Fed reduced the required reserve percentage from 10% to 8%, banks were required to hold less money in reserve and could lend out more of their deposits. This increases the money supply in the economy through the money multiplier effect, stimulating lending, spending, and economic growth. The Fed would use this tool during economic slowdowns or recessions.
A is backwards: lowering reserve requirements expands (not contracts) the money supply. Contractionary policy would involve raising reserve requirements. C is incorrect because reserve requirement changes significantly affect money supply through the lending multiplier. They are not neutral and serve a monetary policy purpose, not just a safety function (though they do contribute to bank stability). D is completely backwards: lowering reserve requirements allows banks to hold less in reserve and lend more, not less. This answer confuses the direction of the policy action.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to identify whether monetary policy actions are expansionary (stimulative) or contractionary (restrictive). Understanding that lowering reserve requirements = more lending capacity = expansionary policy is essential for evaluating Fed policy changes and their likely economic effects. While reserve requirements are currently 0%, historical questions about this tool may still appear to test conceptual understanding.
All of the following statements about reserve requirements are accurate EXCEPT
C is correct (the EXCEPT answer). This statement is FALSE. Lowering reserve requirements is an expansionary monetary policy tool, not contractionary. When the Fed lowers reserve requirements, banks can lend out a larger percentage of their deposits, increasing the money supply and stimulating economic growth. Contractionary policy (used to combat inflation) would involve raising reserve requirements to restrict lending and reduce money supply.
A is accurate: reserve requirements are set by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors through regulatory authority granted by Congress. Individual banks cannot set their own reserve requirements, and while Congress established the Fed's authority, it does not set specific reserve requirement percentages. B is accurate: this is the fundamental definition of reserve requirements. They establish what portion of deposits must be held as reserves (vault cash or deposits at the Fed) versus what can be lent to borrowers. D is accurate: the Fed reduced reserve requirements to 0% on March 26, 2020, and this remains the current policy. This effectively eliminated reserve requirements as an active monetary policy lever.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to distinguish between expansionary and contractionary monetary policy actions. This is one of the most commonly tested concepts. Understanding that lowering reserve requirements = expansionary (more lending, more money supply) while raising reserve requirements = contractionary (less lending, less money supply) is fundamental to analyzing Fed policy decisions.
A bank has $200 million in deposits. The Federal Reserve announces it is raising the reserve requirement from 0% to 5%. Which of the following statements about this policy change are accurate?
1. This represents contractionary monetary policy
2. The bank must now hold $10 million in reserves
3. This action would increase the money supply in the economy
4. The Fed would likely implement this to combat inflation
B is correct. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate.
Statement 1 is TRUE: Raising reserve requirements is contractionary monetary policy. By forcing banks to hold more money in reserve, the Fed reduces the amount available for lending, which decreases the money supply and slows economic activity.
Statement 2 is TRUE: Calculate the required reserves: $200 million × 0.05 (5%) = $10 million. The bank must hold $10 million in reserve (as vault cash or deposits at the Fed), reducing the amount available for loans from $200 million to $190 million.
Statement 3 is FALSE: Raising reserve requirements decreases the money supply, not increases it. When banks must hold more in reserve, they have less to lend out. This reduces the money multiplier effect and contracts the overall money supply in the economy.
Statement 4 is TRUE: The Fed would use contractionary policy (like raising reserve requirements) to combat inflation. By reducing money supply and making credit less available, the Fed can cool down an overheating economy and reduce inflationary pressures. Raising reserve requirements would make borrowing more difficult and expensive, slowing spending.
The Series 65 exam tests your comprehensive understanding of how monetary policy tools work and their intended effects. Understanding that raising reserve requirements = contractionary = fights inflation = reduces money supply is essential for evaluating Fed policy actions. This type of Roman numeral question requires you to connect multiple concepts (the mechanics of reserves, policy intentions, and economic effects) simultaneously.
💡 Memory Aid
Think of reserve requirements as the BANK VAULT MINIMUM: the percentage of deposits that must stay locked in the vault (or at the Fed) instead of being lent out. Lower requirements = MORE lending = EXPAND economy (expansionary). Higher requirements = LESS lending = CONTRACT economy (contractionary). Memory trick: "Reserve MORE = Lend LESS". CRITICAL UPDATE: Since March 2020, the vault door is wide open (0% requirement), but banks still keep cash there voluntarily because the Fed pays them interest (IORB) to do so.
Related Concepts
This term is part of this cluster:
More in Monetary Policy Tools
Where This Appears on the Exam
This term is tested in the following Series 65 exam topics: