Definition of "Security"
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The statutory catch-all and substance over form
- 2:05 The four Howey test prongs for investment contracts
- 3:58 Why active investor management kills prong four
- 4:42 Modern "primarily" standard and prong exceptions
- 5:57 Notes: presumed security and rebuttable presumptions
- 7:19 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why the Uniform Securities Act (USA) definition of "security" is deliberately broader than stocks and bonds, and why the catch-all provision kills every labeling trick on the exam
- How the substance-over-form doctrine works: regulators and courts examine economic reality, never the promoter-supplied name
- What the four Howey test prongs are and why all four must be satisfied: investment of money, common enterprise, expectation of profits, and derived primarily from the efforts of others
- Why prong four (efforts of others) is the most commonly tested trap, and how active investor management instantly destroys investment contract status
- How modern courts relaxed the original "solely from the efforts of others" standard to "primarily" or "substantially," and why minimal investor effort still leaves prong four intact
- What happens to the Howey test when there is no investment of money (free assets) or no expectation of profits (personal consumption), and why either failure makes it not a security
- Why a promissory note is presumed to be a security under the USA, and which three fact patterns rebut that presumption (personal loans, short-term consumer notes, home mortgage notes)
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. When you're ready to drill the topic, the full Series 63 course adds adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.