Fund Objectives and Policy Changes
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The 1940 Act sandbox scenario: Carla, Riley, and the mean coin pivot
- 1:12 What counts as a fundamental policy and who can change it
- 2:22 Majority of outstanding voting securities: the two-pronged lesser-of trap
- 3:35 Board composition baseline: the 40% independent director rule
- 4:46 SEC exemptive rule exception: 12b-1 and multi-class funds need majority independent
- 5:24 Board duties: advisory contracts, auditors, pricing, and 12b-1 plans
- 6:07 Annual advisory contract renewal requirement
- 6:22 Rapid-fire exam recap: five testable points
What this video covers
- What counts as a fundamental investment policy under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and why changing one triggers a mandatory shareholder vote
- The exact two-pronged legal definition of "majority of outstanding voting securities": 67% of shares present (if more than 50% of outstanding are represented) versus more than 50% of all outstanding shares, and why the lesser of the two controls
- The 40% baseline for independent (non-interested) directors on a fund board, and the 60% corresponding cap on interested persons
- When SEC exemptive rules override the 40% baseline and require a majority of independent directors instead: specifically for funds with 12b-1 distribution fees or multi-class share structures
- Board duties including advisory contract approval, auditor selection, share pricing, and 12b-1 plan approval
- The annual renewal requirement for advisory contracts under the Investment Company Act
- How the board of directors, not the portfolio manager or the open market, sets the offering price for fund shares
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. When you're ready to drill the topic, the full Series 7 course adds adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.