Verification of Investor Accreditation and Sophistication
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Who gets past the Reg D velvet rope
- 1:00 The 1-2-3 rule for accredited status
- 2:23 The $400,000 joint income trap
- 2:46 Primary residence exclusion and the 60-day mortgage rule
- 4:23 Reasonable steps to verify, no self-certification
- 4:56 Series 7, 65, 82 licenses as the brains backdoor
- 5:28 Accreditation versus sophistication, the suitability bait
- 6:52 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- The 1-2-3 rule for accredited investor status: $1 million net worth, $200,000 individual income, $300,000 joint income with spouse
- Why the joint income threshold is $300,000 (not $400,000), and why the income test requires two consecutive years plus a reasonable expectation for the current year
- The primary residence exclusion from net worth, and the 60-day rule that counts new home-secured debt as a liability
- Which FINRA licenses (Series 7, Series 65, Series 82) in good standing automatically qualify a holder as accredited
- What "reasonable steps" to verify accreditation means for a registered representative on a Reg D private placement, and why self-certification alone is not enough
- The distinction between accreditation (objective financial capacity) and sophistication (subjective knowledge and experience)
- Why a wealthy but inexperienced customer can be accredited yet still unsuitable for complex products like options or structured notes
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. When you're ready to drill the topic, the full Series 7 course adds adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.