Analysis of Revenue Bonds
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Feasibility studies and revenue quality
- 1:32 Protective covenants and the catastrophe clause
- 2:26 Additional bonds test and parity bonds
- 3:13 Gross vs net pledge flow of funds
- 4:42 DSCR: 2.0x novelty vs 1.25x utility
- 6:06 EMMA, official statements, and credit enhancements
- 7:46 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why a feasibility study by an independent consulting engineer is required before a revenue bond issue, and what it actually evaluates
- How essentiality and exclusivity drive revenue quality, and why utility revenue is more reliable than novelty-project revenue
- The protective covenants in the bond indenture: rate, insurance, maintenance, catastrophe, and non-competition clauses
- Why the additional bonds test must be satisfied BEFORE new parity bonds are issued, and how subordinate (junior lien) bonds differ
- The flow of funds under a gross revenue pledge versus a net revenue pledge, and the memory trick that net means "not until operations and maintenance (O&M) is paid"
- The debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) formula, why 2.0x is standard for non-essential projects, and why 1.25x is adequate for utility revenue bonds
- How credit enhancements like bond insurance shift credit risk from the issuer to the insurer, and where to find continuing disclosure on Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA)
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. When you're ready to drill the topic, the full Series 7 course adds adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.