Marketing Limits: Private vs. Public Offerings
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Riley the rep's private offering dilemma
- 0:58 Three communication categories for public offerings
- 1:35 The marketing divide: public access versus private limits
- 2:05 Why advertising undoes the no-solicitation exemption
- 3:16 The accredited-only exemption VIP-door tradeoff
- 4:08 The tombstone filing exclusion trap
- 4:55 Carve-outs that kill the tombstone exclusion
- 5:25 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why a publicly registered offering can market across retail communications, institutional communications, and correspondence while a private offering generally cannot
- How the no-solicitation private placement exemption and the accredited-only exemption create opposite marketing limits for otherwise similar private deals
- Why general advertising blows up the no-solicitation exemption by undoing the non-public character that made the exemption available
- What the accredited-only exemption requires in exchange for permitting general solicitation: every purchaser must be an accredited investor
- Why a tombstone-style announcement of participation in a private placement, though excluded from filing, does not grant permission to market the underlying offering
- When the tombstone filing exclusion itself disappears: publicly offered direct participation programs and securities issued by a registered investment company
- The four-step mental checklist to run on exam day before selecting any answer involving marketing limits
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 82 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, available in Free Beta.