Offering Communications and Research Safe Harbors: Rapid Fire
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Tombstone versus proposed-offering notice
- 1:04 The 21-item closed list and open-end fund bar
- 2:14 Generic advertising: fund types without fund names
- 3:15 Three research safe harbors and two mechanisms
- 5:01 Prospectus delivery before the shareholder vote
- 6:04 The private placement trap and general solicitation
- 7:09 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- The tombstone rule's 21-item closed list, its filed-registration-statement prerequisite, and why naming underwriters immediately signals tombstone rather than proposed-offering notice
- The proposed-offering notice timeline: pre-filing allowed, legend disclaiming an offer required, and the absolute ban on naming underwriters
- Why registered open-end funds are barred from the tombstone rule while closed-end funds may use it, and when the legend versus prospectus contact applies
- Generic advertising boundaries: fund types in general yes, specific fund or security names no, plus sponsoring broker-dealer identification requirements
- The three research safe harbors split across two mechanisms: non-participant exclusion from underwriter status versus different-class and continuing-coverage declarations that a report is not an offer
- Why only the different-class and continuing-coverage safe harbors reach qualified institutional buyer private resales and offshore deals, and the three-year disqualifier lookback
- Prospectus delivery timing before shareholder votes on reclassifications, mergers, consolidations, or asset transfers, and why no safe harbor here licenses private placement advertising
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 82 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, available in Free Beta.