Refusing or Closing Accounts: Where the Authority Sits
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Why Riley the rep cannot unilaterally open an account
- 0:49 The principal's documented acceptance and effective refusal
- 2:08 Closing rules differ from opening rules
- 3:19 Failed identity check and the customer identification program
- 4:35 The four mandatory outcomes when verification fails
- 5:19 The hidden SAR requirement after refusal or closing
- 5:54 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why a representative cannot unilaterally open a customer account, and what principal-level documented acceptance means for refusing one
- How closing an account differs from opening or refusing it, and why the firm's own written supervisory procedures govern the decision instead
- The four specific outcomes a customer identification program must address when identity verification fails: not opening, transacting while pending, closing after failed attempts, and filing a suspicious activity report (SAR)
- Why a failed identity check may still require a suspicious activity report even after the account is refused or closed
- How to read exam answer choices that try to assign a principal's signature requirement to closing, or that end the analysis at account refusal
- The exact boundary between the representative's role and the principal's authority, and where the test writers set their traps
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 82 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, available in Free Beta.