Documentation of Customer Authorization: Full Versus Limited
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Introducing Riley the Rep and the full versus limited discretion split
- 0:42 The three written requirements for full discretionary authorization
- 2:26 Active recall: why verbal permission fails the exam trap
- 3:03 Limited time-and-price discretion and its zero-paperwork structure
- 3:33 The end-of-day expiration and the order-ticket requirement
- 4:16 The institutional account good-till-cancelled not-held exception
- 4:51 The plot twist: reps versus third-party agents and the dual vocabulary
- 6:07 Rapid-fire exam recap: your exam day checklist
What this video covers
- The three written requirements for full discretionary authorization: prior written customer authorization, firm acceptance evidenced in writing, and principal order-by-order approval
- Alternative actors who may evidence firm acceptance and approve discretionary orders (the firm itself, or a specifically designated partner, officer, or manager)
- The scope of limited time-and-price discretion: only the price at which, or the time when, a definite amount of a specified security is executed
- Why limited time-and-price discretion requires no prior written customer authorization, no firm acceptance, and no principal order-by-order approval
- The automatic end-of-business-day expiration for limited time-and-price discretion, and the signed-and-dated written extension required to continue it
- The institutional account exception: valid good-till-cancelled instructions on a not-held basis are not bound by the end-of-day cutoff
- The second industry meaning of full versus limited: for third-party power of attorney, limited means trade only while full adds withdrawal of cash and securities
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 82 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, available in Free Beta.