Compensation
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Fiduciary compensation basics and fee-type conflicts
- 1:02 Qualified-client tests and the primary residence exclusion
- 3:30 Fulcrum fee symmetry requirement
- 4:32 Soft-dollar safe harbor three-step test and eligible vs ineligible items
- 5:56 Hardware trap: software passes, physical devices fail
- 6:37 Pay-to-play politics and the two-year ban penalty
- 7:39 De minimis dollar limits and the non-voteable trap
- 8:44 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why asset-based fees, hourly fees, fixed fees, commissions, and wrap fees each create different conflicts of interest, and why written pre-advice disclosure is mandatory for every arrangement
- How the qualified-client test gates performance-based fees, and the critical distinction between the $1.4 million assets-under-management test and the $2.7 million net worth test
- Why a client's primary residence is excluded from the net worth calculation, and how exam questions trap test-takers who add home equity incorrectly
- What a fulcrum fee requires: symmetrical sharing of gains and losses relative to a benchmark, and why gains-only arrangements are prohibited
- The three-step soft-dollar safe harbor test, and why research software passes while computer hardware fails
- How pay-to-play rules impose a two-year compensation ban for improper political contributions, and the dollar-amount differences between SEC adviser de minimis limits ($350 voteable, $150 non-voteable) and MSRB municipal-securities-dealer limits ($250 voteable only)
- Why memorizing dollar thresholds without understanding the underlying fiduciary conflict leaves you vulnerable to twist questions on test day
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 65 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, free through December 31, 2026.