Exempt Reporting Advisers and Private Fund Advisors
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The ERA as regulatory middle ground after Dodd-Frank
- 1:39 Two paths to exemption: private fund adviser vs venture capital adviser
- 3:06 The $150M AUM trap and the zero-threshold VC distinction
- 4:24 Why 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) define funds, not advisers
- 5:03 Filing abbreviated Form ADV Part 1 within 60 days
- 6:15 Federal ERA status does not preempt state registration
- 7:26 State antifraud authority applies to everyone always
- 8:25 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why ERAs exist and who qualifies: private fund advisers under $150 million in U.S. assets under management (AUM), plus venture capital fund advisers of any size
- The critical exam trap that the $150 million AUM cap applies to private fund advisers only, not to venture capital fund advisers
- Why 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) are Investment Company Act exclusions that define the fund entity itself, not rules that apply to the adviser
- What an ERA must still file: a subset of Form ADV Part 1 items, private fund information, and the 60-day deadline to claim the exemption
- Why federal ERA status does not automatically preempt state registration, and the separate state exemption requirement under the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) model rule
- Why exemption from registration never means exemption from state antifraud authority, which applies to all advisers operating within a state
- How to walk through an exam day scenario and correctly identify which regulator can pursue an ERA for misconduct
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 66 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.