Due Diligence Activities: Rapid Fire
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The disclosure standard's two prongs and the material omission trap
- 1:24 Reasonable investigation: no fixed checklist, bring-down refreshes, reliance limits
- 2:13 Sell-side versus buy-side: who builds, hosts, consumes, and inspects
- 3:17 Hidden risk targets: six buy-side areas and off-balance-sheet hunting
- 4:08 Sarbanes-Oxley: insider loans, two-business-day reporting, and control assertions
- 5:51 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- The two-pronged disclosure standard, why the word "or" between untrue statement and material omission is the exam trap, and how a technically accurate registration statement can still trigger liability
- Why reasonableness is situation-specific with no fixed checklist, and how an initial public offering (IPO) demands deeper investigation than a follow-on for a seasoned issuer
- How bring-down due diligence works as a pre-closing refresh, not a one-time signing event, and the limits of reasonable reliance on issuer officers and experts
- Sell-side versus buy-side roles across eight comparison categories, including why reverse due diligence, background checks, and cost-saving identification each run on only one side
- The six substantive buy-side due diligence areas and why off-balance-sheet items, unfunded pension liabilities, and retiree health liabilities are explicit buy-side risk-discovery targets
- The Sarbanes-Oxley insider-loan ban, why market terms do not save the loan, the two-business-day Form 4 reporting deadline, and the 10% beneficial-owner trigger
- The two internal-control assertions required for a complete filing (management's assessment and auditor's attestation), and which filers qualify for exemptions
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.