The Fairness Committee and Internal Approval
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Two tables, two committees: internal fairness committee versus client special committee
- 1:37 FINRA's four written procedure requirements and the compensation review trap
- 2:29 Balanced review means non-deal team challenge, not banning Blake
- 3:47 Where Blake presents: full board versus special committee of independent directors
- 4:53 Conflicts flow from internal committee into the proxy document
- 5:42 Rapid-fire recap
What this video covers
- Why the fairness committee is internal to the investment bank, never a committee of the client's board, and how to eliminate answer choices that blur that line
- The four required elements of written procedures: selection process, member qualifications, balanced review, and valuation appropriateness
- Why "compensation review" is a fraudulent substitute for valuation appropriateness on the exam
- What balanced review actually requires: non-deal team personnel must participate, but the deal team is not banned from committee membership
- Who receives the fairness opinion presentation after internal approval: standard board for arm's length deals, special committee of independent directors for going-private and related-party transactions
- Why conflicted management on the full board necessitates bypassing them in favor of the special committee in going-private deals
- How conflicts confirmed during the internal fairness committee meeting flow into the written opinion letter and ultimately into the proxy or prospectus
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.