Material Adverse Change (MAC) / Material Adverse Effect (MAE) Clauses
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The escape hatch: what MAC and MAE mean
- 0:58 Trigger versus carve-outs: the tug of war
- 1:46 Pandemic pop quiz: why market-wide events fail
- 3:40 Risk allocation and the serious-and-lasting standard
- 5:02 Asymmetric remedies: MAC for buyer, specific performance for target
- 5:47 Why most signed deals still close
- 6:12 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- What a material adverse change (MAC) or material adverse effect (MAE) clause is: the buyer's conditional right to walk from a signed deal if the target's business deteriorates materially between signing and closing
- Why the MAC definition trigger is broad but the carve-outs do almost all the work, including general economic conditions, industry conditions, changes in law, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, natural disasters, deal-announcement effects, and failure to meet projections
- How risk allocation works: the buyer absorbs macro market risk while the target retains company-specific risk, so a global pandemic tanking sales is usually excluded
- Why a short-term dip or single bad quarter generally does not qualify as a MAC, and the serious-and-lasting standard the buyer must prove
- How deal protections are asymmetric: the buyer gets the MAC clause, but the target does not get a reciprocal MAC right; the target's remedy for a wrongful walk-away is specific performance to force closing at the original price
- Why MAC is rarely invoked successfully in practice, and why buyers prefer to renegotiate price or close as-is rather than risk losing a specific performance lawsuit
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.