Futures and Forward Contracts Compared
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The locked-in price scenario: buyer walks away
- 1:27 Standardized versus customized terms
- 2:43 Exchange-traded versus over-the-counter venues
- 3:42 Credit risk: clearinghouse versus counterparty
- 5:17 Daily mark-to-market versus delivery settlement
- 6:53 Factory-made versus handshake memory aid
- 7:30 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why standardized terms make futures interchangeable and liquid, while customized terms make forwards illiquid and hard to offset
- How exchange-traded futures have public competitive prices, while over-the-counter (OTC) forwards have private negotiated prices
- Why the clearinghouse eliminates individual counterparty risk for futures, and why forwards carry direct counterparty default risk with no central guarantor
- How daily mark-to-market settlement prevents credit exposure from accumulating in futures, while forwards settle the full gain or loss only at delivery
- Which characteristics the exam writers pair as traps (customized with futures, no counterparty risk with forwards) and how to spot the wrong pairings
- Why the vast majority of futures contracts are offset before delivery, while forwards are typically held to delivery due to lack of a secondary market
- The "factory-made versus handshake" memory aid and how each metaphor maps to exam-testable features
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 3 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, free through the end of 2026.