Plan of Reorganization, Disclosure Statement, and Confirmation
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The eight-step reorganization gauntlet
- 1:27 Debtor exclusivity: 120 days to 18 months
- 1:54 Disclosure statement vs. confirmation hearing
- 2:24 Adequate information and the IPO prospectus trap
- 3:24 Consensual confirmation checklist and best interests test
- 4:51 Voting math: two-thirds amount and one-half number
- 5:00 Impairment as rights, not recovery
- 6:47 Cramdown requirements and insider vote exclusion
- 7:49 Fair and equitable: three paths for secured creditors
- 8:51 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why the disclosure statement hearing and the plan confirmation hearing are separate procedural steps that cannot be combined or skipped
- What adequate information means for a disclosure statement, and how it differs from the rigid disclosure standards in an Initial Public Offering (IPO) prospectus
- How debtor exclusivity works: the 120-day initial period, extendable up to 18 months, and why it is a massive tactical advantage in plan negotiation
- The six requirements for consensual confirmation, including why best interests of creditors is a holder-by-holder test, not a class-level test
- How creditor class voting works: the two-thirds in amount and more-than-one-half in number prongs, and what happens when one prong clears but the other fails
- Why impairment is a legal-rights question, not a recovery question, and how unimpaired classes are deemed to accept while classes receiving nothing are deemed to reject
- The three cramdown requirements: at least one impaired non-insider class accepting, no unfair discrimination, and fair and equitable treatment (including the absolute priority rule and the three alternative paths for secured creditors)
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.