Anti-Takeover Defenses and Structural Impediments
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 Three tiers of defenses: board, charter, and state law
- 1:50 Poison pill mechanics: flip-in, flip-over, and beneficial ownership triggers
- 3:34 Staggered boards: why delay is never universal
- 4:37 Control share statutes: voting rights, not ownership rights
- 5:49 Fair price statutes: single-tier offers bypass the restriction
- 6:24 Business combination statutes: interested stockholder freeze
- 7:14 Defeasibility cheat code: advance board approval
- 7:51 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why a shareholder rights plan (poison pill) is a board control mechanism, not a permanent sale-blocker, and how the flip-in versus flip-over provisions dilute the acquirer
- What beneficial ownership means for trigger calculations, and why derivatives, options, and swaps can count toward the pill threshold even without record ownership
- How a staggered (classified) board operates as a delay mechanism, and why there is no universal two-year or two-contest rule for hostile bidders seeking board control
- What a control share acquisition statute actually restricts (voting rights, not ownership rights), and the process for restoring those voting rights
- Why a fair price statute targets only coercive two-tier tender offers, and how a uniform single-tier offer bypasses the restriction entirely
- How a business combination statute labels an acquirer as an interested stockholder, and why state-specific thresholds and delay periods are never universal
- The defeasibility cheat code for all three state-law statutes: advance board approval, and why ESOP exclusions and other carve-outs vary by jurisdiction
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.