Lock-Up Agreements
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The post-IPO battlefield and why lock-ups exist
- 0:56 SEC mandate vs. private contract: the most tested trap
- 2:04 Issuer lock-up vs. shareholder lock-up: two shields
- 2:58 Issuer gotchas: hidden supply events in the agreement
- 3:50 180 days: standard, not regulatory floor
- 4:28 Waiver rights: who holds the keys
- 5:21 Managing the cliff: staggered releases, secondaries, and extensions
- 5:54 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- Why lock-up agreements are private contracts between the underwriter and the issuer or its insiders, not Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandates, and what the SEC actually requires
- The difference between an issuer lock-up (blocking new shares from coming out of the company) and a shareholder lock-up (blocking existing shares from insiders entering the market)
- What the issuer lock-up restricts beyond primary issuance, including registered exchanges and employee stock purchase plan accelerations
- Why 180 days is the industry standard IPO lock-up duration, and why 90-day or 365-day terms are still valid negotiated outcomes with no regulatory floor
- Who holds the waiver right for early release from a lock-up, and the distinction between a discretionary waiver and the hard contractual cliff
- How underwriters manage price overhang at the cliff through staggered releases, controlled secondary offerings, or lock-up extensions
- The valuation analyst's perspective on modeling the cliff as a scheduled supply event versus a rare negotiated exception
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.