Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The two halves of the FINRA fairness opinion rule
- 1:11 When the disclosure trigger applies: public shareholders
- 2:48 The six disclosure items overview
- 3:22 Item one trap: success fee means disclose, not disqualify
- 3:55 Items two and three: stapled financing and the two year lookback
- 5:43 Items four, five, and six: conditional versus absolute requirements
- 6:57 The biggest conceptual trap: disclosure rule, not prohibition rule
- 7:39 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- When the disclosure obligation applies: opinion to the board plus "knows or has reason to know" it will reach public shareholders, usually through proxy statements, prospectuses, or tender-offer documents
- Why "knows or has reason to know" is broader than explicit knowledge, and how a deal headed to a public shareholder vote satisfies this standard automatically
- How to map the big three compensation and relationship disclosures to their item numbers: item one (success fee), item two (other contingent payments including stapled financing), and item three (material relationships)
- Why the two year lookback in item three applies to all parties on both sides of the transaction, not just the company receiving the opinion
- The conditional nature of item four (independent verification) versus the absolute yes-or-no requirements of items five (fairness committee approval) and six (insider-compensation comparison)
- Whether the opinion expresses a view on the fairness of compensation to officers, directors, or employees relative to compensation to public shareholders under item six
- Why the FINRA fairness opinion rule requires disclosure of conflicts rather than prohibiting them, and who makes the final decision to retain a conflicted advisor
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.