When a Fairness Opinion is Necessary
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 What a fairness opinion is and definitely is not
- 0:50 The exact conclusion: "fair, from a financial point of view"
- 2:54 Buy-side versus sell-side: who gets the opinion
- 4:12 Four deal patterns and the special committee trap
- 5:27 Duty of care versus advisor rules: the legal split
- 7:00 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- The exact scope of a fairness opinion: "fair, from a financial point of view" and why it never guarantees best price, highest price, or non-financial fairness
- Why both buy-side and sell-side boards can seek opinions, and the exam trap of pairing both sides with the same investment bank
- The four deal patterns that typically trigger a fairness opinion: public-company shareholder votes, going-private transactions, related-party or conflicted deals, and stock-for-stock consideration
- When a special committee of independent directors must commission the opinion, and why the full board recuses itself in management buyouts (MBOs)
- The distinction between state corporate law governing the board's duty of care and industry regulatory rules governing the advisor's disclosures
- Why a fairness opinion supports the duty of care defense but does not satisfy or replace independent board review
- How to spot wrong answer choices that claim the opinion covers employees, communities, regulators, long-term strategy, or deal soundness
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 79 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.