Information Obtained in a Fiduciary Capacity
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 The two-hat conflict: fiduciary versus retail broker
- 1:16 Four fiduciary capacities Priya oversees
- 2:14 The ownership data protected by the rule
- 3:20 Lawful acquisition does not authorize unrelated use
- 4:05 The issuer-solicitation exception and its paperwork
- 5:25 Use-based test: four scenarios, fired or pat on the back
- 6:12 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- The four fiduciary capacities covered by the rule: paying agent, transfer agent, trustee, and any similar fiduciary capacity
- What ownership-of-securities information is protected, and why mailing addresses and tax details are not the target of the prohibition
- Why the fiduciary-information prohibition triggers on the use of the data, not on how it was lawfully obtained or received
- The exam trap of lawful acquisition: a firm can legally collect holder lists as a transfer agent and still violate the rule by using them for retail solicitation
- The issuer-solicitation exception: solicitation at the request and on behalf of the issuer, including tender offers, proxy votes, and rights offerings
- Why the issuer must be the principal directing the solicitation, and why Riley cannot go rogue even if he believes the issuer would benefit
- How to apply the use-based test across four concrete scenarios to distinguish violations from permitted activity
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete Series 24 course also includes adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards, free through the end of 2026.