Fee-Based vs. Commission-Based Accounts
Chapters in this video
- 0:00 How broker compensation shapes conflicts of interest
- 1:26 Commission-based accounts and the taxi meter analogy
- 2:18 Churning: over-trading to rack up commissions
- 3:12 Fee-based accounts and the flat-fee structure
- 4:12 Reverse churning: the unused gym membership trap
- 5:04 Side-by-side comparison of both account types
- 5:41 Reg BI applies to both fee-based and commission-based
- 6:16 Rapid-fire exam recap
What this video covers
- How a commission-based account works (per-transaction fee) and why it suits buy-and-hold infrequent traders
- How a fee-based account works (flat fee or percentage of assets under management) and why it suits active traders
- What churning is: excessive trading in a commission-based account to generate commissions for the representative
- What reverse churning is: charging ongoing fees in a fee-based account when the customer trades very infrequently
- Why a fee-based account can be just as unsuitable as a commission-based account if it does not match the customer's trading activity level
- How Reg BI applies equally to both account types and mandates that the compensation model match the customer's actual trading frequency
- The exact exam trap of assuming fee-based accounts are inherently safer for all customers
Read the full lesson, free
This video's complete written lesson is free to read in the CertFuel app, no signup wall. The complete SIE course in the app is free too, including adaptive practice questions and spaced-repetition flashcards.