Definition
Estate Planning
The process of arranging wealth transfer strategies to minimize taxes and ensure assets pass to intended beneficiaries. Includes wills, trusts (revocable and irrevocable), powers of attorney, beneficiary designations, and gifting strategies. The estate tax basic exclusion amount is $15 million per individual for 2026, and the annual gift tax exclusion is $19,000 per recipient for 2026.
A client with a $20 million estate establishes an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) to exclude $5 million in life insurance proceeds from their taxable estate, and gifts the annual exclusion amount ($19,000 for 2026) to each of their four grandchildren to reduce the estate using the annual gift exclusion.
Revocable trusts provide no estate tax benefits (assets included in estate) but do avoid probate. Irrevocable trusts can exclude assets from the estate for tax purposes but generally cannot be changed or revoked by the grantor. Powers of attorney terminate at death, even durable powers.
How is Estate Planning tested on the exam?
- Distinguishing between revocable and irrevocable trusts for estate tax purposes
- Understanding annual gift exclusion ($19,000 per recipient in 2026, unchanged from 2025) vs. the lifetime basic exclusion amount ($15 million for 2026)
- Identifying when powers of attorney terminate (a nondurable power at incapacity or death, a durable power at death)
- Recognizing estate planning strategies like TOD (Transfer on Death) designations to avoid probate
- Understanding the three-year lookback rule for life insurance transferred to ILITs
Regulatory limits
Regulatory Limits
| Description | Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Annual gift exclusion per recipient | $19,000 (2026) | Indexed for inflation (unchanged from 2025 to 2026); gifts to a U.S. citizen spouse instead qualify for the unlimited marital deduction |
| Estate tax exemption (individual) | $15 million (2026) | Set at $15 million for 2026 by Public Law 119-21 and indexed for inflation after 2026; the scheduled sunset to about $7 million did not take effect |
| Estate tax exemption (married couple) | $30 million (2026) | Combined exemption with portability election |
| Life insurance three-year lookback | 3 years | Existing policy transferred to ILIT included in estate if donor dies within 3 years |
| Non-citizen spouse annual gift limit | $194,000 (2026) | Higher annual exclusion for gifts to a spouse who is not a U.S. citizen (IRC 2523(i)(2)) |
Think of estate planning as the "Triple T" strategy: Transfer (TOD designations, beneficiaries), Trust (revocable avoids probate, irrevocable can remove assets and their growth from the estate), Tax-free gifts ($19K per person annually for 2026). Remember: Revocable = Probate fix, Irrevocable = Tax fix. Powers of attorney are "power until death" (they terminate when you die, even durable ones).
Practice questions
Test your understanding with the questions below. Pick an answer to reveal the explanation.
Margaret, age 68, has a $22 million estate and wants to ensure her three adult children inherit as much as possible while minimizing estate taxes. She is married, and her spouse is a U.S. citizen. Her investment adviser is helping her evaluate estate planning strategies. Which recommendation would best accomplish Margaret's goals?
B is correct. Annual gifts of $19,000 per child (the annual exclusion for both 2025 and 2026) remove assets from Margaret's estate without using her lifetime exemption. For larger transfers, an irrevocable trust removes the assets and their future growth from the gross estate while providing control over distributions, although gifts above the annual exclusion are taxable gifts that use part of her lifetime exemption. With a $22 million estate and a 2026 basic exclusion amount of $15 million, proactive gifting strategies reduce the taxable estate.
A is incorrect because revocable trusts do not provide estate tax benefits. Assets in revocable trusts remain in the grantor's taxable estate; revocable trusts only avoid probate, not estate taxes. C is incorrect because while the unlimited marital deduction defers estate tax, it does not minimize total estate taxes. When the spouse dies, their estate would include both estates and could exceed the exclusion, especially if no portability election preserved Margaret's unused exclusion. D is incorrect because powers of attorney terminate at death and cannot be used to manage assets after death. Estate administration requires an executor or trustee, not a power of attorney.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to recommend appropriate estate planning strategies based on client goals and estate size. Understanding that revocable trusts avoid probate but not estate taxes, while irrevocable trusts and gifting strategies reduce taxable estates, is critical for high-net-worth client planning.
What is the annual gift tax exclusion amount per recipient for 2026?
C is correct. The annual gift tax exclusion is $19,000 per recipient for 2026, the same as for 2025. This amount is indexed for inflation. An individual can give up to $19,000 of present-interest gifts to an unlimited number of recipients each year without using any portion of their lifetime exemption or filing a gift tax return; gifts of future interests do not qualify for the exclusion.
A ($10,000) was the exclusion amount in the late 1990s and early 2000s but has been increased multiple times due to inflation indexing. B ($15,000) was the exclusion amount from 2018-2021 but is outdated. D ($25,000) exceeds the current exclusion and would require using a portion of the lifetime exemption or paying gift tax on the excess $6,000.
The Series 65 exam frequently tests knowledge of current gift and estate tax thresholds. Understanding the annual gift exclusion is essential for advising clients on tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and recognizing when gifts exceed reporting thresholds.
Robert transfers an existing $3 million life insurance policy on his own life into an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) to benefit his children. Two years later, Robert dies unexpectedly. What are the estate tax consequences of this transfer?
B is correct. IRC Section 2035 imposes a three-year lookback rule for life insurance policies transferred to ILITs. Because Robert died within three years of the transfer, the full $3 million death benefit is included in his taxable estate. To avoid this rule, the ILIT should purchase a new policy rather than accept a transfer of an existing policy, or the insured must survive at least three years after the transfer.
A is incorrect because the three-year lookback rule causes the death benefit to be included in the estate when the insured dies within three years of transferring an existing policy. The irrevocable nature of the trust does not override this rule. C is incorrect because the lookback rule includes the full death benefit, not just the cash value at transfer. D is incorrect because there is no split. The entire death benefit is either included (if died within 3 years) or excluded (if survived 3+ years).
The Series 65 exam tests understanding of the three-year lookback rule for life insurance transfers, a common estate planning pitfall. This rule demonstrates that simply transferring assets to an irrevocable trust does not guarantee estate tax exclusion. Timing and proper structuring are critical.
All of the following statements about estate planning documents and strategies are accurate except
C is correct (the exception). All powers of attorney, including durable powers, terminate immediately upon the death of the principal. "Durable" means the power survives the principal's incapacity, not their death. After death, the estate is managed by the executor (if there is a will) or administrator (if no will), not by someone holding a power of attorney.
A is accurate: Revocable trusts avoid probate because assets are owned by the trust, not the individual. However, they provide no estate tax benefit because the grantor retains control and the assets remain in their taxable estate. B is accurate: TOD (Transfer on Death) designations allow securities to pass directly to named beneficiaries without going through probate, similar to POD (Payable on Death) for bank accounts. D is accurate: Irrevocable trusts remove assets from the grantor's control and estate, potentially excluding them from estate tax calculations if properly structured.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to distinguish between probate avoidance strategies (revocable trusts, TOD designations) and estate tax reduction strategies (irrevocable trusts, gifting). Understanding when powers of attorney terminate is critical for advising clients on complete estate planning and avoiding gaps in asset management authority.
A married couple, both U.S. citizens, has a combined estate of $35 million. They are evaluating estate planning strategies to minimize estate taxes for their heirs. Which of the following strategies would effectively reduce their taxable estate?
1. Each spouse gifts $19,000 annually to each of their five grandchildren
2. They establish a revocable living trust to hold all marital assets
3. They create an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) to own a new $8 million policy
4. They transfer assets using the unlimited marital deduction
A is correct. Only statements 1 and 3 would effectively reduce the couple's taxable estate.
Statement 1 is true: Annual gifts of $19,000 per grandchild (each spouse can gift separately, totaling $38,000 per grandchild or $190,000 total annually to five grandchildren) permanently remove assets from the estate without using any lifetime exemption. Over multiple years, this strategy significantly reduces the taxable estate.
Statement 2 is false: Revocable living trusts do not reduce estate taxes. While they avoid probate and provide privacy, assets in revocable trusts remain in the grantor's taxable estate because the grantor retains full control and can modify or revoke the trust at any time.
Statement 3 is true: An ILIT that purchases a new policy (avoiding the three-year lookback rule) excludes the $8 million death benefit from the taxable estate. This removes a significant asset from estate tax calculation while providing liquidity to pay estate taxes or support heirs.
Statement 4 is false: The unlimited marital deduction defers estate tax by allowing tax-free transfers between spouses, but it does not reduce the total estate tax burden. When the surviving spouse dies, their estate includes both their own assets and those received from the deceased spouse, potentially resulting in a larger taxable estate. It delays but does not eliminate estate tax.
The Series 65 exam tests complete understanding of which estate planning strategies actually reduce estate taxes versus those that merely defer taxes or avoid probate. Understanding the distinction between tax reduction (gifting, irrevocable trusts) and tax deferral (marital deduction) or probate avoidance (revocable trusts, TOD) is essential for high-net-worth client planning.
What concepts relate to Estate Planning?
This term is part of this cluster :
Where does Estate Planning appear on the Series 65 exam?
This term is tested in the following Series 65 exam topics:
Ownership and Estate Planning
Series 65 questions on JTWROS, tenants in common, trusts, gifting, and wealth transfer strategies....
practice questions โSpecial Types of Accounts
Practice questions on UTMA/UGMA, 529 plans, ESAs, and custodial accounts....
practice questions โClient Profile and Data Gathering
Practice questions on risk tolerance, investment objectives, time horizon, and suitability analysis....
practice questions โ